Free signals until the open journal proves they are worth paying for.

The strip above is a fact, not a forecast: 127 closed trades over 60 days since 2026-07-28, a $1,000 model bank at 2% risk per trade, all from the journal.

There are no return forecasts here and there will be none. Any “per month” or “per year” figure derived from a short history is noise, not a property of the strategy. The only source of expectations is the journal itself, and it grows by 2-3 signals a day.

The 10% drawdown inside the same 60 days comes from the same series as the profit. A leveraged strategy without drawdowns does not exist, so it is shown next to the result, not hidden.

Few signals: 2-3 a day across 200 coins, only limit entries into a confirmed level zone in the direction of the trend. Every component of the strategy passed a statistical test, and dozens of plausible improvements were rejected, three of them in the last week.

Asymmetric exit: three targets, a 2.5 ATR stop, trailing after the second target, and no break-even move, which twice proved significantly harmful in testing.

Percentages are measured against the entry price without leverage. No “+80% on margin” screenshots.

Telegram timestamps every signal and that cannot be edited. Outcomes are computed by a program from the exchange's 5-minute candles, not by a person from memory.

Losses are as visible as profits: the worst day, the worst trades, the losing weeks. The journal is open without a password and rebuilt from the database every hour.

The site carries a real name. When a check does not confirm a number, the number changes: in August an internal audit revised the expected return downward and it was published.